And the court says that we can kill babies from conception until just before breech.
I'm not impressed with your blind allegiance to a small group of elitists. (Our country was founded on the premise of not trusting government. I guess people like you would be considered 'progressive'.)
Fortunately I give the court more credit for basic intelligence than I do, well, than I do you.
Get real, NS. The fact that FOUR of the five justices recently voted that the individual does not have the RKBA doesn't bother you?
Keep sipping that Kool-Aid, NS. Vladimir Lenin loved people like you.
So I'm not worried that I'll ever be faced with a decision like that.
That's it, NS. Don't answer the question. Thats typical of you. When faced with a tough question, you duck and run.
One justice away from a de facto repeal of 2A and these people have your dying loyalty. One justice and perhaps an Obama appointed one at that. And you know what Schumer, Brady, Pelosi, and all the gun control idiots are going to do then, don't you? Is this another court decision that you will blindly adhere to?
Will a future posting from NS go something like, "Give up your guns, cowboyway. The Supreme Court is more intelligent that all of us put together, and, they are the law of the land. And always right. Always. And never politically motivated. Never, never, never. I'm taking mine down to the gun drop off center today. It's right on the way to the re-education center, so I can kill two birds with one stone."
But you go right ahead worrying yourself sick over it.
Some of us have to bear the burden for the head-in-the-sand, useful idiots.
And let's sum up your position: the Constitution means whatever an individual says it does, the rule of law is meaningless and the Constitution merely something to wipe your behind on, and some states have more rights than others.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Yes they did. And you and I may disagree with that decision until the cows come home and that isn't going to make abortion illegal. Now is it?
I'm not impressed with your blind allegiance to a small group of elitists.
My God! Cowboyway is not impressed. How will I ever learn to live with a stigma like that?
One justice away from a de facto repeal of 2A and these people have your dying loyalty.
Where the hell have you been? The Supreme Court has limited gun ownership rights for decades. And the Heller decision is certainly not the all encompassing ruling on free and open firearm ownership that you seem to think it is. If you read the decision you'll note that Scalia endorsed the idea that 2nd Amemdment rights are not unlimited, and that the government can prohibit ownership of certain types of weapons. So where are we better off than we were before? So D.C. can't outlaw handgun ownership completely. They can, and will, impose laws that will limit it as much as they can. Scalia's ruling is a joke.
But for all that, it is still a valid Supreme Court ruling and it is binding, until D.C. figures out ways around it. But Scalia could have protected gun ownership rights far more than he chose to do, with his narrowly defined decision.
Will a future posting from NS go something like, "Give up your guns, cowboyway.
I doubt it. Future postings to you will probably be a lot like past postings to you - pointing out just how silly your opinions are.