Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philosophy: Who Needs It (Ayn Rand Address to the US Military Academy)
Ayn Rand Institute ^ | 1974 | Ayn Rand

Posted on 07/23/2008 10:55:27 AM PDT by mnehring

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: grey_whiskers
"Like, *PING*, dude."

Wow, man, like this is really cool!

Well, grey_whiskers, I suspect your whiskers are not quite as grey as mine. (I'm not very good at the jargon of the 60's drug scene, I'm afraid.) I've posted this speech of Rand's, and commented on it, many times. It is really timeless, and only just an introduction to her larger work, Philosophy, Who Needs It.

I am not an Objectivist, especially not one of the current day claimants of that ideology (which it is to those who think Objectivism is a movement, not a philosophy) who are mostly subjectivists and hedonists--totally opposite of all Rand thought and taught.

This is the age of corruption of everything, springing from the dominance of postmodernism and cultural Marxism, so nothing is surprising, if still very discouraging.

Thanks for the ping.

Hank

21 posted on 07/23/2008 7:19:34 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Yes, Hank, it is true that my whiskers are not as grey as yours.

But I had to name myself *something*.

Also, I seem to recall your saying that you were not a Randian, although you seemed to admire parts of her philosophy (e.g. standing on one's own and eschewing altruism).

Nonetheless, the speech was interesting enough that I thought you'd like to see it.

Cheers!

22 posted on 07/23/2008 7:25:45 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Bump.


23 posted on 07/23/2008 7:33:53 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swiss

You have my thanks for linking that Heinlein speech. It’s been a while since I read it. He was brilliant.


24 posted on 07/23/2008 7:37:02 PM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Swiss

Slow start, but overall - several parts in particular - very powerful.


25 posted on 07/23/2008 8:39:35 PM PDT by M203M4 (True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
There is a special reason why you, the future leaders of the United States Army, need to be philosophically armed today. You are the target of a special attack by the Kantian-Hegelian-collectivist establishment that dominates our cultural institutions at present.

You are attacked, not for any errors or flaws, but for your virtues. You are denounced, not for any weaknesses, but for your strength and your competence. You are penalized for being the protectors of the United States. On a lower level of the same issue, a similar kind of campaign is conducted against the police force. Those who seek to destroy this country, seek to disarm it--intellectually and physically. But it is not a mere political issue; politics is not the cause, but the last consequence of philosophical ideas. It is not a communist conspiracy, though some communists may be involved--as maggots cashing in on a disaster they had no power to originate. The motive of the destroyers is not love for communism, but hatred for America. Why hatred? Because America is the living refutation of a Kantian universe.

Today's mawkish concern with and compassion for the feeble, the flawed, the suffering, the guilty, is a cover for the profoundly Kantian hatred of the innocent, the strong, the able, the successful, the virtuous, the confident, the happy. A philosophy out to destroy man's mind is necessarily a philosophy of hatred for man, for man's life, and for every human value. Hatred of the good for being the good, is the hallmark of the twentieth century. This is the enemy you are facing.

YES YES YES YES. Rand nails it so well it is scary.

26 posted on 07/23/2008 8:59:31 PM PDT by M203M4 (True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

There is an excellent essay in her book “The New Left” in which she compares/contrasts the news and cultural coverage of the landing on the moon to the coverage of Woodstock. It is one of my favorites.


27 posted on 07/23/2008 9:42:09 PM PDT by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I did enjoy it, and am happy someone posted to FR, and thank you again for pointing it out to me.

You are right, I’m not a Randian, but I do admire her and appreciate much of her philosophy, and am always sorry to see her misunderstood. The Brandens did an awful hatchet job on her.

Hank


28 posted on 07/24/2008 1:36:19 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

bookedmark


29 posted on 08/01/2008 5:46:00 PM PDT by since1868
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Yup...I recently began reading Atlas Shrugged, and naturally I became interested in the author.

Seems she was exactly as you described.

She was vehemently anti-religious. I find it interesting she mentions evil but not a thing about being Holy.

She was against the U.S. entering both world wars.


30 posted on 08/01/2008 7:47:34 PM PDT by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing-----Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

There are some interviews with her on YOUTUBE. One is from Phil Donahue’s show in the lat 1970s, just a few months before Ayn Rand died. She had lost her husband and was still mourning him...but she held steadfast, at least publicly, to her atheism.

Another recommendation is the film “The Passion of Ayn Rand”, which is a SHOWTIME cable show movie about her. Some of it certainly is fictional, but she did have an affair with a subordinate and it messed up his marriage. The woman who plays her is Helen Mirren, the lady who won an oscar last year for her portrayal in “The Queen”. Mirren does a great job looking and sounding like Rand.

For what it is worth.


31 posted on 08/02/2008 3:46:49 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Overdue BTTT.


32 posted on 01/04/2022 11:34:36 AM PST by Pagey (Valerie Jarrett. She IS STILL in DC creating More Havoc on This Country. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson