OK, I read the first page of the article. It's a bunch of tripe promoting Dawkins. The article leads off Dawkins put Creationists in their place [with his views as an athiest]. After the first page I see I'm wasting my time with the article.
I don't care how much you lick Dawkins boots, you are not going to be able to prove the non existence or something you can't prove that exists. I thought I'd give the article a chance but it's pure promotion by sycophants. I regret falling in the trap of expecting more.
Ich bin nicht ein bootlichter!