Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
The very next sentence says:
The recent discovery of naturally occurring plasmids that confer a Cit+ phenotype on E. coli strains (14, 15, 35) has provided an explanation for the periodic isolation of bacteria that would have been called E. coli except for their ability to utilize citrate.
So the only reason that these other bacteria are NOT called "E. coli" is due to their ability to utilize citrate.

You continue to amaze me.
34 posted on 07/18/2008 11:56:47 AM PDT by Sopater (A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left. ~ Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Sopater
Once again, it is the difference between acquiring a set of tools and making them yourself.

Plasmids are often swapped between bacteria, and an e. coli may well come across a plasmid that has the enzymes to digest citrate (yet without the ability to absorb citrate it probably looses it just as fast); this is hardly the same as developing the ability on its own WITHOUT being given a plasmid. Do you understand the difference?

39 posted on 07/18/2008 12:59:25 PM PDT by allmendream (If "the New Yorker" makes a joke, and liberals don't get it, is it still funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson