
An artist's rendering of the SeaGen marine current generator from above and below the surface.
1 posted on
07/17/2008 6:54:45 PM PDT by
rawhide
To: rawhide
But this will slow down the ocean and might injure fish...
2 posted on
07/17/2008 6:59:56 PM PDT by
Coffee200am
("We should all be living in mud huts and riding bicycles to avoid killing the polar bears..."/s)
To: rawhide
I think that might mess up the gulf stream, I saw it on “Superfriends”
5 posted on
07/17/2008 7:24:02 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: rawhide
At least this makes more sense than wind power.
Tides are at least predictable, so you know when you are going to have to ramp up your “supplemental” conventional power generation.
6 posted on
07/17/2008 7:33:11 PM PDT by
seowulf
To: rawhide
It’s a good idea, and I hope it works....and doesn’t turn into a bigger problem.
7 posted on
07/17/2008 7:43:31 PM PDT by
Coffee200am
("We should all be living in mud huts and riding bicycles to avoid killing the polar bears..."/s)
To: rawhide
The SeaGen will face plenty of competition from other wave-power devices that have already reached commercial-scale deployment.

Scotland-based Pelamis Wave Power's snakelike device was the first to provide power to the grid when it was installed off the coast of Orkney, Scotland, in 2004. In October 2007, Pelamis deployed three of its 750-kilowatt devices--770-ton, 120-meter-long chains of metal cylinders--off the coast of Portugal.


A company called Wavegen now operate a commercial wave power station called "Limpet" on the Scottish island of Islay.

To: rawhide
No power is generated during tide changes, as the turbine only works when the water is moving 2 knots (2.3 mph) or more. That's gonna take one hell of a battery pack to sustain the current 24/356.
9 posted on
07/17/2008 10:24:40 PM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson