Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lawdave

It was essentially a sidelight to the battle; having no measurable affect one way or the other. And it wasn’t coordinated within Longstreet’s attack. It was a separate engagement although it was meant to distract Union forces during the attack on Cemetery Ridge.

It’s mentioned both by Foote and McPherson in their volumes on the war.


100 posted on 07/16/2008 9:46:44 AM PDT by bcsco (To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: bcsco
It was essentially a sidelight to the battle; having no measurable affect one way or the other. And it wasn’t coordinated within Longstreet’s attack

My point was that the author I read thought it was much more than a side light and that it was coordinated. In particular the author noted how Stuart fired a cannon before Pickett's charge to indicate he was in position and that after action reports made reference to Stuart's part of the attack as sweeping down a road to attack the Union forces (who were being attacked by Pickett)from the rear. However, it failed because Custer intervened.

121 posted on 07/18/2008 11:57:46 AM PDT by lawdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson