Skip to comments.
Coal in your car's tank
The New American ^
| June 9, 2008
| Ed Hiserodt
Posted on 07/15/2008 1:32:18 PM PDT by djsherin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
07/15/2008 1:34:12 PM PDT
by
djsherin
To: Army Air Corps
2
posted on
07/15/2008 1:36:56 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: djsherin
Its old technology. There is no excuse for not doing it.
We should be building coal-to-diesel plants in every coal producing state. Now, already.
3
posted on
07/15/2008 1:38:12 PM PDT
by
marron
To: marron
I bet there are actually people who would say it was a crime against humanity to use it because it was perfected by the NAZIS. I heard they also made butter from coal.
4
posted on
07/15/2008 1:40:47 PM PDT
by
isrul
(Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
To: djsherin
Our local gov’t is spending about $1 million to study building a coal to liquid plant here. It’s not like we are short of oil here, and coal to liquid will not be cheaper, but somebody has to get this started and it looks like local or State will have to do it since FedGov seems to be unaware of any energy solution.
5
posted on
07/15/2008 1:43:58 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(I will veto each and every beer)
To: RightWhale
...local or State will have to do it since FedGov seems to be unaware of any energy solution.
They are aware, but they don't care. Remember, the Feds love problems, but could give a tinker's damn about real workable solutions.
6
posted on
07/15/2008 1:47:16 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Army Air Corps
That appears to be the case. They have other priorities, which need not be named at this time since we all know.
7
posted on
07/15/2008 1:50:23 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(I will veto each and every beer)
To: djsherin
As I've posted before, a coal gasification plant was built in Beulah North Dakota. It went on line in 1981 and has been converting lignite coal to natural gas for the last
27 YEARS!Converting coal fired plants to coal gasification would be a great investment. Use the Social Security excess cash flow to fund Utility bonds. The Utilities would convert their plants and the and the bond interest would flow into the Social Security fund and also produce economic security!
8
posted on
07/15/2008 1:52:17 PM PDT
by
Young Werther
(Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
To: djsherin
If you are interested in German WWII `cutting-edge’ inventions, like night-vision, leviathan tanks (the `Maus’); vertical take off aircraft, etc.
http://www.somethingawful.com/booklist/about.htm
(`My Tank Is Fight’; for smart people, they did some really stupid things)
9
posted on
07/15/2008 1:52:25 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(at your feet or at your throat: das Deutschers)
To: djsherin
Ye gods, Nazi/Apartheid technology, nuclear power, coal mining AND individual POVs? There aren’t enough kittens in the world, you should want the Liberals to have more? ;^)
10
posted on
07/15/2008 1:54:47 PM PDT
by
Grut
To: RightWhale
The USAF has issued a contract to investigate coal liquifaction for aircraft fuel.
11
posted on
07/15/2008 1:55:41 PM PDT
by
DallasDeb
((a.k.a. USAFA2006Mom!))
To: Army Air Corps
The energy shortage isn’t a problem for Dems. It is an opportunity.
12
posted on
07/15/2008 1:57:20 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(No More Obama - The corruption hasnÂ’t changed despite all our hopes.)
To: driftdiver
An opportunity to be pilloried in the public square by p.o.’ed working men and women?
13
posted on
07/15/2008 1:58:33 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: DallasDeb
That’s to the good. The Dept of Energy was created over 30 years ago to do this investigation and was funded sufficiently to build coal to liquid plants all over the country by now. It would have been painless, but it still has to be done and it won’t be painless at this point.
14
posted on
07/15/2008 2:01:47 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(I will veto each and every beer)
To: djsherin
Coal liquifaction powered by a nuclear reactor. I live in NY State. The hardcore left here will never allow such a thing, regardless of how cheap or efficient.
Sad.
15
posted on
07/15/2008 2:03:59 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Army Air Corps
“An opportunity to be pilloried in the public square by p.o.ed working men and women?”
No, an opportunity to forward their socialist cause and acquire more power.
16
posted on
07/15/2008 2:04:22 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(No More Obama - The corruption hasnÂ’t changed despite all our hopes.)
To: isrul
I heard they also made butter from coal. Oh Really?
17
posted on
07/15/2008 2:06:03 PM PDT
by
Hazwaste
(Vote! Vote for the conservative local, state, and national candidates of your choice, but VOTE!)
To: tumblindice
It makes you realize how close we came to losing that war.
All the more reason to NOT diddle around when dealing with Iran with all the BS sanctions and crap.
To: djsherin
I’ve been interested in this idea for quite a while. To me, coal gasification just makes sense. We have the coal (and *lots* of it), we have the gasification technology (and have had for decades), and the resulting fuel burns very cleanly.
It might not be the cheapest solution, especially if oil prices begin to fall/the speculative bubble bursts. But it is a solution that can be accomplished entirely within our borders. And (IMHO) the security it could bring make it more than worth the cost.
To: isrul
Butter from coal. I heard that, too. It is likely true.
20
posted on
07/15/2008 2:09:40 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(I will veto each and every beer)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson