“Ok, as someone who is tagged with evangelical and I am not self tagged that way.....I did not support MR because he is a liberal.
Now I am constantly amazed and amused that some if not most ldsers are to thick to get it - MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal and that is why I do not support him.”
With this childish chant:
” ... MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal ... I know I’m not a liberal is neither is Mitt. McPain is. Obama is. Perhaps that is another reason you are attracted to one of the two? Don’t tell me, Mike, the shyster was your man. He’s WORSE than Obama when it comes to liberalism.
Sure its childish just making a point.
MR based on his policies as governor is a liberal, at the very least liberal leaning.
I am not sure who you mean “Mike”. If you are speaking of Huckabee, oh h@ll no.
Where you get that I may be a JM or Barry supporter is waaaay beyond me but oh well.
The only one I see posting that "childish rant" is you.
The sober fact is that Romney was universally considered a Liberal Republican up until 24 months ago, even by his own party.
We have been going over this since last November. Romney's "Conservative" record is very thin - on homosexuals, on guns, and on judges.
Mitt Romney: A Massachusetts Liberal for President
It would be a mistake of epic proportions for McCain to select Mitt Romney. The Conservative base already is trying again and again to swallow its own spit in order to attempt to vote for McCain.
And yes - the selection of Romney would alienate Evangelical Christians - who are a HUGE portion of the GOP base.
There were 26.9 million Evanglical Christian votes up for grabs in 2004. Bush won 79% of them.
Do you think McCain will match that?
He better hope he even exceeds it if he expects to be in the White House in 2009.
But, I expect McCain to pick Romney.
He isn't even answering Obama's attacks. It appears he wants to lose this race.
If he picks Romney, he will definitely get his wish.