[tacticalogic]

We aren’t talking about statistical averages. We’ve talking about predicting, at any given moment exactly what track the next particle that passes through that chamber will produce. If we can’t do that, does that render the theories of particle physics invalid?

[muawiyah]

Does it? A particular thesis that's found to not be supported by the evidence (particle goes down path A instead of path B) may well be rejected as not having relevance ~ ergo, it may be abandoned.

Here we have a situation in "evolution" that's really troublesome. Mice and men have essentially the same number and type of genes.

Whales and bats are essentially indistinguishable from mice and men, rats, bats, horses, pigs and monkeys at the genetic level.

Given that genes were acceped as the likely geerators of "characteristics" I'd suggest that particular thesis may be in grave danger and should be questioned.