Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Soliton
I agree that this forum is not for religion; but evolution is a religion; it takes more faith to believe the contradicting trash evolutionists put out, that to believe in the creator.

When Neil Armstrong guided the lunar lander down toward the surface of the moon in 1970 he had many concerns. One of those was Cosmologist Isaac Asimov’s prediction in 1958: “I get a picture, of the first spaceship picking out a nice level place for landing purposes, coming slowly downward tail-first and sinking majestically out of sight.” Asimov had calculated that, if the moon had been around a few billion years, it would be covered with a layer of cosmic dust several miles thick. That, of course, is why NASA first sent an unmanned lander that found, to Asimov’s surprise, only two or three inches of dust. And we are all familiar with pictures of Armstrong’s footprints in the shallow lunar dirt. Evolutionists depend heavily on huge eons of time to allow for all the happy accidents necessary for life to evolve from the primordial soup. Yet they keep bumping into evidence that the earth is less than 10,000 years old. Our explorations on the moon have turned up many types of evidence that the earth and its moon have not been around the billions of years that evolutionists claim. The lunar dust is only one item of lunar evidence confounding the evolutionists. With modern methods of measurement, scientists have discovered that the moon is traveling away from the earth at the rate of one and one-half inches a year. This means that, if it had been around billions of years, it would have been so close to the earth that it would have been pulled into the earth by gravity. The moon rocks brought back by the astronauts also betrayed the old earth theory. They contained the short-term radioactive isotopes Uranium 236 and Thorium 230 that would have turned to lead in only a few thousand years. This, alone, is very important proof that the moon cannot be older than several thousand years

9 posted on 06/30/2008 11:28:41 AM PDT by gedeon3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gedeon3
Yet they keep bumping into evidence that the earth is less than 10,000 years old.

If you can provide some scientific evidence that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, I would be facinated.

12 posted on 06/30/2008 11:30:50 AM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: gedeon3
evolution is a religion

Where did you learn theology?

17 posted on 06/30/2008 11:45:27 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: gedeon3

I thought the lunar dust stuff was explained when we found evidence of the cosmic cleaning lady. I think they found a tip envelope leaned up against one of our flags.


19 posted on 06/30/2008 12:16:16 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson