Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Dark Knight Review
Rolling Stone ^ | 2008 | Rolling Stone

Posted on 06/27/2008 7:50:22 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: fish hawk
*Snerk*

LOL!

Consider yourself *highly* commended for you humor, sir.

Cheers!

61 posted on 07/01/2008 9:44:46 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux

I was telling one of my friends how it usually gets on my nerves when critics are borderline giving sexual favors in movie/music/book reviews. However, in the case of The Dark Knight it just makes me more excited to see it.

Due to circumstances beyond my control I have to wait 2 weeks to see it. All of my friends have already been warned that any spoilers sent my way will result in summary execution of our friendship.


62 posted on 07/01/2008 10:47:08 PM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde
Aw, man. That stinks. Lol. I'll be going to see it in IMAX...taking off work that day to go see it in the morning.

BTW, here's a few more reviews. The first is Variety's (again rave) review:

An ambitious, full-bodied crime epic of gratifying scope and moral complexity, this is seriously brainy pop entertainment that satisfies every expectation raised by its hit predecessor and then some.

Kirk Honeycutt of the Hollywood Reporter says:

Pure adrenaline. [Nolan], having dispensed with his introspective, moody origin story, now puts the Caped Crusader through a decathlon of explosions, vehicle flips, hand-to-hand combat, midair rescues and pulse-pounding suspense.

As to save us any further complications, the reviews are beginning to pour into Rottentomatoes.com...right now, they have 8 total, which I suspect will grow with time. All of them are rave:

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_dark_knight/

63 posted on 07/07/2008 7:48:23 PM PDT by pcottraux (I can't tell the difference between Carl Cameron, Chris Wallace, or Bill McCuddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux; roses of sharon

The first American film made in the PROC.


64 posted on 07/09/2008 2:38:17 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Wow, I had no idea, thanks for the info!


65 posted on 07/09/2008 7:54:05 PM PDT by roses of sharon ( (Who will be McCain's maverick?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux
I got it in the mail from Netflix today. Already seeing some similarities to the TV animated ones. The first episode with the kids talking about how they saw Batman is taken from one of those earlier ones.

The next one with the two black cops is a reverse on the last animated series (on Sat mornings still around here but mostly the same one season) with the “Batwave” Batman.

The woman cop trust Batman and the dude doesn't which is backwards from that series. The hispanic girl in the cartoon didn't like Batman and the black guy turned into Clayface.

66 posted on 07/09/2008 9:07:44 PM PDT by Fledermaus (McCain is just socialist-lite. I'm not playing the "lesser of two evils" game any more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Yeah, I got to see it a week early because of my job. I liked it enough to buy it at Wal-Mart today.

I give it a solid B. It had lots of lame parts, and lots of really good ones. I think the last one, “Deadshot,” is my favorite, although the one you were referring to (”Crossfire”) was very well-written. I had to think about the flashback-training one for a minute, and thought the Scarecrow-kidnaps-the-cardinal episode was good, if a bit...weird.

The kid one was atrocious. The animation was incomprehensible and static, the characters were poorly drawn, and the voice acting was embarrassing. The fake street-thug accents were painful to listen to. And for the record, I do love that particular episode of B:TAS it seemed taken from...but the execution was a LOT better in that one (and the references/tributes to Batfan-culture were hilarious).


67 posted on 07/09/2008 10:16:16 PM PDT by pcottraux (I can't tell the difference between Carl Cameron, Chris Wallace, or Bill McCuddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

If you recall there were quite a few scenes of Japanese brutalizing various people. One gathers this was played up to please the host country. The Japanese atrocities in China were considerable were considerable. It’s a good film that was not a popular success. I think people mixed it up with The Last Emperor.


68 posted on 07/10/2008 7:54:22 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux

So far the only complaints I have seen is that it is a little too intense for the duration. That by the end you are worn out.

I have seen that movie theaters are rapidly adding 3 a.m. and 6 a.m. shows to meet demand. And The Joker gave away free tickets to several IMAX showings the other day. He is a sneaky devil, subverting capitalism now.


69 posted on 07/11/2008 11:12:41 PM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde

Richard Roeper and Michael Philips on “Ebert and Roeper.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UELDTKPC-lo


70 posted on 07/12/2008 10:33:17 PM PDT by pcottraux (I can't tell the difference between Carl Cameron, Chris Wallace, or Bill McCuddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux

I read today on Drudge that the movie is already 90% pre-sold for Friday.

Warner Bros. is playing down expectations but it could go over $150 million (a record) this weekend.

Glad I bought mine over a week ago. Our local IMAX isn’t showing it though. I doubt the limited IMAX availabe leaves Nashville out of the loop. Maybe it will come eventually.


71 posted on 07/16/2008 5:42:07 PM PDT by Fledermaus (McCain is just socialist-lite. I'm not playing the "lesser of two evils" game any more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
I got lucky. The IMAX theater in Charlotte usually shows educational stuff for kids...but they're showing "The Dark Knight" for some reason. I've got my tickets for early Friday (taking off work to see it...this is practically a holiday for me. Lol.)

Mr. Blonde; we have two reviews from Roger Ebert and James Berardinelli, my two all-time favorite movie critics. Both gave it 4 stars...and coming from Berardinelli, that's something. The last time he gave a movie 4 stars was 2006's "The Departed." I would warn that the Ebert one is very spoilerish.

Ebert.

Reelviews.

72 posted on 07/16/2008 6:58:10 PM PDT by pcottraux (I can't tell the difference between Carl Cameron, Chris Wallace, or Bill McCuddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Seems I touched a raw nerve pointing out that a WB magazine is pimping a WB movie.

If by "touched a nerve," you mean caused your opponent to completely counter your point, then yes you're absolutely right. From an outsider's perspective it looks more you got smacked down hard when it was pointed out that positive reviews are pouring in from a wide variety of sources that have nothing to do with the WB. The movie has a 94% on the tomato meter, which is an incredibly good score derived from just about every source out there. For the love of all that is conservative, will you please tell us which sanctified source we "lesser" conservatives are supposed to turn to for all of our knowledge on what is worth seeing? You, I suppose, a person who relates every tall building fire to 9/11 plane crashes in the blink of an eye without just cause? Yes, let's all turn to you for our movie critiques, I bet that will make us all better conservatives...
73 posted on 07/18/2008 9:43:53 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Equilibrium and American Psycho. Bale’s pretty good in both. Further, he’s playing John Connor in the next Terminator movie coming out later this year.


74 posted on 07/18/2008 10:10:14 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux
Then I feel sorry for you.

That poster reminded me of the same thing. Gyllenhaal was enough to turn me off, so I wasn't going to see the movie anyway. But that poster was in poor taste, even for Hollyweird.

75 posted on 07/18/2008 10:16:18 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I had not heard about his playing John Connor, very cool!

Terminator movies are another of my guilty pleasures, especially the first which I often quote here on FR:

Listen Republicans, and understand.

The UnAmerican Democrat Party are out there. They can’t be bargained with. They can’t be reasoned with. They don’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until we are dead.


76 posted on 07/18/2008 10:23:04 AM PDT by roses of sharon ( (Who will be McCain's maverick?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
On a 9-11 related note, from '05....

Actress Maggie Gyllenhaal Makes Controversial Remarks About 9/11

77 posted on 07/18/2008 10:23:13 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Illuminatas

Hehe, I knew where you were going on that one...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zwnsz0WqHp0


78 posted on 07/18/2008 11:21:20 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

His character in 3:10 to Yuma was great. Liked that movie all around.


79 posted on 07/18/2008 1:43:02 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
I’m going to see “Wanted” this weekend starring Angelina Jolie. I’m expecting it to be a horrible movie but I’m looking to be entertained. It’s been a hectic week.

If you suspend dis-belief, "Wanted" is a fun action flick. Pure entertainment, decent plot. Jolie is looking thin, though. Wife and I enjoyed it. No preachy message to have to sit through.

80 posted on 07/18/2008 1:46:02 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson