Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

Very valid point, and you could well be right. However, politics is the art of the possible, and he might have had to give a little to get a little.

After all, the voters may well decide to recall some of their pols and/or vote them out next election cycle over this. Also Jindal may learn from this episode. If he doesn’t, THEN toss his assets out. I just hate to hear that the best people we get into office in a generation aren’t cut the slightest bit of slack - especially since we have already seen what we could have gotten more of: typical LA politicians - the best that money can buy.


68 posted on 06/22/2008 7:01:21 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: clee1
However, politics is the art of the possible, and he might have had to give a little to get a little.

Judging from the reaction of the Louisiana electorate, this is giving a lot. He's going back on a public promise made to veto the increase. And he's doing so right out of the box. If he folds this early on then the people of Louisiana, and those in the rest of the country watching his performance as Louisiana's governor, have to wonder what he'll fold on next?

Jindal has gotten where he is without having really accomplished a lot other than accumulting an impressive-sounding resume. His time as governor will be his first real challenge, the first time he actually has to practice what he preaches. While the jury is still out, let's just say this first test appears to be a disappointment.

73 posted on 06/22/2008 7:21:56 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson