We have not redefined marriage—it has always been between one man and one woman.Acceptance of interracial marriage did not change the basic concept of one man one woman.
Legal contracts are made everyday where one person promises things to more than one person.
Women from the time of Moses in Jewish society, and later, in Western civilizations, had the right of inheritance of property.
You say that informed consent cannot be overturned due to 1,000 years of precedence. We are about to overturn 5,000 years of precedence. And since when, in a legal free for all that describes modern jurisprudence, would this even be a criteria once the gay lobby starts their wialing and gnashing of teeth over the “injustice” of it all.
All of us will have our society changed when the Pandora’s box is opened. We can disagree on that point, but events will overtake us whether we agree or not.
No. you are factually wrong, it used to be between one man and several women. Moses had a few concubines.
Those contracts are invalid, you can’t promise one car to two different people.
Look if you honestly cared about marriage, you’d be spending your time trying to rid America of “No-fault” divorce.
When you are on the same side of the Islamic terrorists, you really should rethink your position.