Saying something over and over again without supporting it is the hallmark of the propagandist. "We can't drill our way out"; "It'll be a decade before it comes on line"; "Life from non-life is unscientific".
If life from non-life is unscientific, then what about non-life from life? Popes and paramecia die. One minute they live the next minute they don't. Suddenly they begin to revert to chemicals.
Ultimately, biological death is a result of simple chemistry. People have had their heart and brain function stopped (they "died")by cooling and then had them restored by warming. Warmth is necessary for the chemical reactions that are life.
If life ceases and restarts due to chemical processes, it is reasonable to hypothesize that life originated through the evolution of chemical processes. That hypothesis is being tested in laboratories all over the world.
Will you offer some support for your statement that the study of "life from non-life is unscientific"?
I predict in a day or two the anti-science crowd will return, ignore the last 20 posts and start their screed from the beginning.