More from this moonbat:
” We all get the Bush side of 9/11. Why did Osama bin Laden initiate 9/11? Wikipedia helps here (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks ):
The fatwa states that the United States:
n Plunders the resources of the Arabian Peninsula.
n Dictates policy to the rulers of those countries.
n Supports abusive regimes and monarchies in the Middle East, thereby oppressing their people.
n Has military bases and installations upon the Arabian Peninsula, which violates the Muslim holy land, in order to threaten neighboring Muslim countries.
n Intends thereby to create disunion between Muslim states, thus weakening them as a political force.
n Supports Israel, and wishes to divert international attention from (and tacitly maintain) the occupation of Palestine.
You can see why frustration by Muslims mounted into the 9/11 attack.
Iraqi oil isn’t just an economic boon; that oil guarantees the owner the fuel for the mightiest military in the world.
The Bush administration is bloodthirsty for that power, and has already killed more than one-half million people.”
His bottom lineis that 9/11 was OK.
Timothy McVeigh and Eric Rudolph had a long list of grievances too, but virtually no one on the Right defends them. This is one of the big differences between the mainstream Right and what has become the mainstream Left--the Left is always willing to "understand"/forgive horrific atrocities as long as they are committed in the name of the proletariat.
He has all the credentials to become a convert to islam.