To: zeugma
I believe that is yet another way to say that IE security sucks. I wouldn't necessarily agree. Or that Apples are more secure because Windows sucks. Microsoft products are bigger targets. Hackers would rather invest their energy doing the most damage.
To: LiberConservative
I wouldn't necessarily agree. Or that Apples are more secure because Windows sucks. Microsoft products are bigger targets. Hackers would rather invest their energy doing the most damage. A common myth. And quite wrong.
Microsoft software is more easily exploitable. That's why they're targeted.
Just like bank robbers hit local banks but not Fort Knox.
79 posted on
06/13/2008 1:06:23 PM PDT by
Knitebane
(Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
To: LiberConservative
I wouldn't necessarily agree. Or that Apples are more secure because Windows sucks. Microsoft products are bigger targets. Hackers would rather invest their energy doing the most damage.I think it's more a matter of windows being the lowest-hanging fruit due to design decisions made years ago that have still not been corrected. It's been shown many times over that security through obscurity isn't all it's cracked up to be.
80 posted on
06/13/2008 1:18:23 PM PDT by
zeugma
(Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson