Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: zeugma
I believe that is yet another way to say that IE security sucks.

I wouldn't necessarily agree. Or that Apples are more secure because Windows sucks. Microsoft products are bigger targets. Hackers would rather invest their energy doing the most damage.

73 posted on 06/13/2008 9:51:12 AM PDT by LiberConservative ("Typical" White Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: LiberConservative
I wouldn't necessarily agree. Or that Apples are more secure because Windows sucks. Microsoft products are bigger targets. Hackers would rather invest their energy doing the most damage.

A common myth. And quite wrong.

Microsoft software is more easily exploitable. That's why they're targeted.

Just like bank robbers hit local banks but not Fort Knox.

79 posted on 06/13/2008 1:06:23 PM PDT by Knitebane (Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: LiberConservative
I wouldn't necessarily agree. Or that Apples are more secure because Windows sucks. Microsoft products are bigger targets. Hackers would rather invest their energy doing the most damage.

I think it's more a matter of windows being the lowest-hanging fruit due to design decisions made years ago that have still not been corrected. It's been shown many times over that security through obscurity isn't all it's cracked up to be.

80 posted on 06/13/2008 1:18:23 PM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson