And not one word from Jobs about the Cell in that article. The only thing there about the Cell is speculation from the blogger. In fact, you just showed Jobs discounting programming for processors with four cores ("four, not really"), yet he uses them in the Mac Pro. Plus those systems have eight cores among two processors, and he said "eight, forget it."
You're still Googling what you have no knowledge about to save a failing argument. My proof? Your first "evidence" is the first hit on "steve jobs cell processor."
Typical distraction attempt by you in attacking Apple and Jobs, but they are addressing the problem when all you can apparently do is blindly shill for IBM's chip.