You were taking in circles like usual, saying the chip was quote “far too advanced” for Apple The quote "far too advanced" appears first in this thread in the very post I am responding to right now -- yours. You put it in quotes so you can't say you were paraphrasing. Your habit of lying about my posts is getting absurd.
on and on about how even their servers couldn’t handle the output from a single Cell over the network
You are also the only one here to have said that. Lie #2.
how powerful this thing was some more, even though it’s used in a game console for kids
Such game console being more powerful than the PCs in Folding@Home and being used to make small supercomputers. Yes, it is an extremely powerful chip, the most powerful ever put into a game console.
Learn to stick with the subject, and try to make non-contradictory statements
The subject led here with someone else's question about the subject of the thread.
And learn to quit lying. Two in this very post -- would be impressive for anybody but you. You're slowing down a bit.
“far more advanced” you said, quit yer whining I can't help it this iPhone doesn't have copy and paste yet but my quote of “far too advanced” was plenty close enough to expose your double talk again. Apple dumped IBM and the Cell, get over it, and getting back to the actual subject of this thread what's really going to be funny is if Apple releases new software technology that helps multicore processing in Macs which is exactly where programming for the Cell has flopped. The IBM and Cell cheerleaders like you are going to have even more explaining to do then, how little ole Apple not only dumped your chip but then came up with much more efficient ways of parallel processing on your competitors. Hopefully they'll patent it so the Linux leeches at IBM won't be able to get their grubby hands on it either, that'll be the ultimate irony, IBM and their new chip and software sharing labs in Asia blown out of the water by a small group of guys in Cupertino