Posted on 06/04/2008 7:19:00 PM PDT by rmlew
Personally, I think that any article ending with "For the sake of the sheep, we must.: should never be mentioned in the same sentence article as going to a restaurant.
This is the dumbest article I have ever read on FR. You have got to be kidding me. It makes a few valid points at the beginning, but it just turns into the biggest load of garbage these eyes have seen in many, many months.
That’s what people said about the idea of 2 guys “getting married” 20 years ago.
Bestiality is tame, man. I mean, our future President, B. Hussein Obama, can see dead war heroes out in the audience, and his recent speech indicates when we’re long dead too, we can still look back and recall the glorious day of his coming, when the sea receded and everybody got free health care. So I say real progressives should, like, fight for full liberation of necrophiliacs, you know? Bring people of all races, genders, sexual preferences and state of decomposition together in Hope.
Fair enough, but BEASTIALITY? You can’t be serious...
Grape-flavored, almond scented change for all.
Please explain why it will only end with polyandry/polygamy and pedophilia.
Tax-hike socialist propaganda belongs on DU, not here.
As the then-mayor of New Orleans, Martin Behrman, said when the city was forced to close Storyville, “You can make it illegal, but you can’t make it unpopular.”
Woody Allen was ahead of his time...
Cheers!
And make no mistake - all you have to do is look at all the Big Tent simpletons and see that anything goes is also coming to a GOP near you. Who in their right minds would ever at one time have thought they'd see the GOP pander to illegal aliens and perverts and Greenfece types? But there it is, right in your face, and they're unashamed.
Leftists conceive of it, and the GOP grovels for it. Those are the facts of Life.
I recall reading an article on FR that described bordellos in Sweden that catered to such appetites.
Time to jiggle the handle, this world is about to go swirly...
I agree. In sexual matters, liberals cannot accept any boundaries and still be liberals. As long as the activity is not hurting anyone, as long as it is consensual by liberal logic, it ought to be permitted. How can liberals say there is something immoral about beastiality without being judgemental? My dad said years ago when same sex marriage was first being talked that people marrying dolphins would be next.
Nothing shocks me anymore. I am sometimes glad I am in the last third of my life because at the rate things are going I dread to think of what it will be like in 25 or 30 years.
I find the article very credible, and the last line very, very funny.
ONE OF THE BIGGEST SHORTCOMINGS of the conservative mind is that conservatives generally have moderate intellectual temperaments and therefore don't really grasp the radicalism of the opposition. When the opposition says something that would be absurd if taken to its logical conclusion, we tend to assume that they won't take it there, simply because we wouldn't if we were in their position...
America is defined by a system of values, the most important of which are:
1. Government knows its place.
2. If government gets uppity and out of its place, it is to be slapped down.
Me either. Got numbed years ago. You wake up to stuff like this, and know that Life is holding out less and less promise.
Now they want to tinker with our very DNA because of something that doesn't exist. Anyone who thinks that there's nothing the left won't do is an utter fool.
Take me Home!
And the more it upsets moderates, conservatives and Christians, the better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.