Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sarasota

"Look, my affection for the dress hasn't changed, but what they did was so short-sighted," Parker told the New York Times. "It's just unethical and disappointing that they would allow the dress to be worn again."

Parker said she had remarked to Theyskens during the fitting that it was a surprise to find the dress had never been worn before. He assured her it had not.

"He didn't say, 'Well, actually, I just escorted Lauren down the red carpet at the Met.' I just wish it had been handled differently and they had been straight about it," she continued. "In the big picture, this is not important, but there is a relationship between the entertainment industry and fashion."

from telegraph.co.uk

55 posted on 06/03/2008 4:50:15 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Scarpetta

Theyskens is unethical indeed and it’s difficult to understand why he would deceive. Though the dress is magnificent, the glow is gone.


56 posted on 06/03/2008 5:09:32 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Theyskens is unethical indeed and it’s difficult to understand why he would deceive. Though the dress is magnificent, the glow is gone.


57 posted on 06/03/2008 5:09:42 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: All

Sorry all, but those shoes are hideous! I wonder which designer paid her to wear them?


59 posted on 06/03/2008 5:15:20 PM PDT by Maigrey (Fat makes the World Taste Better! - personal motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson