Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol

I agree. But, the other point is the bank should have verified income before disbursing the check. That was their obligation. As the article said, the banks hoped to pass the entire blame onto the borrower of its lack of due diligence.


41 posted on 05/30/2008 2:54:33 PM PDT by nicola_tesla ("Life is Tough... It's Worse When You're Stupid".... John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: nicola_tesla
But, the other point is the bank should have verified income before disbursing the check. That was their obligation.

Alas liberal political fodder again....

46 posted on 05/30/2008 3:00:42 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: nicola_tesla

newsflash, self employed people do not always have “verifiable” income because they have small corporations that become their expense vehicle.

A person taking LEGAL deductions can dramatically reduce income to very low levels but live a very comfortable life.

The issue is the use of inflated valuations to allow banks to have virtual 100% loan to value loans.

If you want to “punish” the banks then restore the pre-2005 bankruptcy rules allowing for lien stripping. The secured portion of the loan is reduced to the current value of the house. Since this is court approved with the supervision of the bankrupcy trustee, the valuation games are not so available to the bank.


58 posted on 05/30/2008 3:13:46 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson