Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000

That’s no small accomplishment, and it probably is useful in some specialty applications, but I’d personally just rather they rewrote windows to make it smaller and faster. They could stay with a 3.1 looking interface for all I care, and I think that most people would agree. If this is just another bloated layer atop Vista, they’re killing themselves.


5 posted on 05/29/2008 3:14:32 PM PDT by elfman2 ("As goes Fallujah, so goes Central Iraq and so goes the entire country" -Col Coleman, USMC ,4/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: elfman2

Yup. Microsoft has to get with the “small is beautiful” thing. I want an operating system that will do a heck of a lot less, with a heck of a lot less resources, which can run off of a non-writable media, so it reloads fresh every time.


11 posted on 05/29/2008 3:22:05 PM PDT by gridlock (Now that Polar Bears are protected under ESA, where do I go to apply for a permit to breathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: elfman2

I had a boss with the sign:
Faster, cheaper, better - pick any two.
Microsoft could build a system with any one of those improvements and still be better than today.


32 posted on 05/29/2008 5:00:51 PM PDT by tbw2 ("Sirat: Through the Fires of Hell" by Tamara Wilhite - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson