Replies

Pastor told you this personally or is it on paper where we all can see it?

Where everyone can ignore it, you mean. If people can't be bothered to read the paper at the center of the conspiracy, what makes you think they'll accept his denial?

In any case, I'll see if I can find something.

Here ya' go, a portion of a great write-up on the issue (not the one I was looking for, though):

Then there's Robert Pastor, a liberal university professor and globalist, who has talked about an Amero in one of his books and served as a co-chair of the task force that produced the "Building A North American Community" report. Newsflash: I've talked to Pastor and he denies talking to the Bush Administration about any sort of North American Union. Furthermore, he says that to the best of his knowledge they're not working on any such thing. He also noted that the Amero was one of three ideas he floated in one of his books, that he wasn't married to it, and again, to the best of his knowledge, nobody in the Bush Administration is working on it. In addition, Pastor has this to say about the idea of a North American Union:

Each of the proposals I have laid out represent (sic) more than just small steps. But it doesn’t represent a leap to a North American Union or even to some confederation of any kind. I don’t think either is plausible, necessary or even helpful to contemplate at this stage.

Even if Pastor had said exactly the opposite and called for a North American Union to be formed tomorrow, so what? He doesn't work for Bush. It's like having a Communist professor screaming that Lenin was right and we should become a Communist nation tomorrow and then having people like Jerome Corsi go, "See? George Bush is converting America to Communism!" It makes no sense.
Human Events, There Isn't Going to Be a North American Union, January 10, 2007.

I'm sure that the above was posted here one or two times, but I don't feel like looking for it.