You claimed more code, not more files. I showed you more files is true (which I never claimed was false, so you can't sink anything), not more code. You then started using "more files" from then on. And you never credit me with your education when you use it. Disappointing.
Don’t forget the open group either since they own the trademark and know you are wrong too.
See, you don't even credit me with telling you about the Open Group and the trademark and certification. And here you are using it, after having to abandon your lineage definition due to that information. You haven't even thanked me for informing you that POSIX and UNIX certifications are two completely different things. You have completely avoided mentioning that demonstration of your ignorance.
Sadly, you still haven't been able to comprehend the three common definitions of what a UNIX is, so you fail the course.
LOL you did nothing of the sort, you claimed several OTHER entities had more copyrights in Linux, but then your very own link showed GNU (which stands for NOT UNIX) had more than all those you mentioned combined. Yet here you are again of course, trying to use the same disproven claim that GNU isn’t relevant to Linux when they own more copyrights than anyone. No surprise, it’s how you operate, as more and more keep finding out.