I’ve been very consistent in this thread depite your typical strawmen diversions, attempted subject changes, and circle talk. And when I pressed you to finally admit what your specific point supposedly was, you said quote “Linux is a UNIX”. Which is of course bogus, and you’ve provided no evidence it is correct other than another bogus claim you keep repeating that “Unix-like” and “UNIX” are synonymous. Funniest of all are your delusions of granduer, since you can’t even tell the differences between UNIX and Unix-like, or between UNIX and Linux.
I’m sure you’d like to keep talking in circles and keep telling us how smart you think you are LOL, but I have better things to do than listen to someone so pathetically confused about such basic terminology. I suggest you contact kernel.org, or gnu.org, and argue with them that you think they are UNIX even though they know they’re not, and even have “NOT UNIX” in their name. They probably won’t let you bloviate as long as I have though, because they probably won’t find it near as funny LMAO.
UNIX is defined as lineage, changed to UNIX is defined as trademark (you "Mr. IP" had to change once I told you someone legally owned the name and didn't give it out based based on lineage). Not very consistent. Care to lie any more?
I'm still chuckling over you thinking meeting more definitions makes something more UNIX, and over you not knowing the difference between POSIX and UNIX. You're playing out of your league, which is why you have been reduced to screaming nonsense.