Republicans long term gain if Obamanation wins

05/25/2008 | Jyro

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Look at this angle if you will;

You voiced concern over the importance of staying in Iraq. Which is very critical. But we must consider it a lost cause if even McNutless is elected.

The reason is the same thing that happened in ‘75, when Nixon was heavily outnumbered by Democrats in both houses. All the Dems need to do was to vote to defund the war. The President tried to veto it, but it was over ridden. And the rest is horrific and historical of the result. And at a time when we were on the verge of winning, which the public was never informed of until 20 years later.

The coming Democrat tsunami will smother any thing McNutjob tries to accomplish with out their approval. The war will end as they have planned.

[airborne]

In all likelihood, we will win back the Congress in 2010 if Obama wins and then spends the next two years royally mucking up the nation,...

But the RNC isn't going to put conservatives in office. You'll have a whole herd of RINO's in Congress.

[Grampa Dave]

Suicidal bs.

The same bs was the reason idiots voter for PeroRat, and they gave us the Clintoons for 8 years. The 2000 Americans killed on 9/11 are a direct result of that suicidal/insane bs.

Then, we were told how electing Rats 2006 would help our country and our party. I’m still waiting for the better times with Pelosi, Reid and other rats running this country.

Why do people who claim to be conservatives pray and want us to lose elections? Suicidal maybe, pyschotic maybe or maybe they are the real RINO’s and hate a good America.

[penowa]

"If Hussein wins it's the end of this country, period because Soros has his hand up his ass."

And you are unaware that Soros et.al has purchased McCain as well? End of the country? I don't know. If it depends on who Soros owns, then the country is already over barring some divine intervention prior to November.

[Redcloak]

I'm sure that the GOP can succeed politically in Obama's new Caliphate; so expect the Party to see some long term benefit from a McCain loss.

</sarcasm>

[supremedoctrine]

Wouldn’t surprise me if Mc Cain has indeed received Soros cash. But it would surprise me if anyone could find a pic of Soros sitting around in a large room at a “fundraiser” or McCain love-fest, as I have seen him do for Obama.

[freekitty]

I don’t agree with you regarding GW. He doesn’t call the shots and he never was a conservative. That’s why I didn’t like his Daddy.

Some truth to your second paragraph except we don’t have to have Reagan like person in office. A real conservative will do. The Republican party leaders have done themselves in by not being honest with the voters; and they obvious moves to another agenda. We need real, sane and sound policy.

I don’t agree with your last paragraph because tit for tat isn’t going to do it. To hand the election to the enemy is well crazy. Instead of voting for McCain; we should find someone else to run. They are out there and they can still run. And it’s our country.

But, most of all I sincerely feel your frustration as to what is going on. It is painful to watch crooks, liars thieves and any other bad connotation that can be applied rip this country apart. It can change; however; but the people will have to band together to do it.

[tom h]

You have a point here, considering the fact that, in 1994, the Repubbies had a firebrand of a Minority Leader in Newt Gingrich. Today, we have nothing of the sort.

But the good news is that, in 1994, the MSM was still exclusively leftist except for Rush Limbaugh. Today, conservatives have a much better chance because of the multiplicity of ways that folks get their news.