Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

The device pictured, while portable, is nothing whatsoever like a “window airconditioner” - it doesn’t sit in the window, for starters, but has a large apparatus “near” the window containing all the mechanicals.

If that’s what he patented, it’s understandable that the “large appliance manufacturer” didn’t feel any obligation to pay him royalties for a true window unit.


2 posted on 05/24/2008 1:50:42 PM PDT by Redbob (WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Redbob

“If that’s what he patented, it’s understandable that the “large appliance manufacturer” didn’t feel any obligation to pay him royalties for a true window unit.”

Drawings for Utility Patents frequently don’t resemble the commercial product because such patents are issued on the strict uniqueness of how they work and not on their final appearance. Patents issued on the unique appearance of a devices are called Design Patents (i.e., the shape of a Coke bottle).


8 posted on 05/24/2008 2:02:45 PM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Redbob
“The device pictured, while portable, is nothing whatsoever like a “window airconditioner” “

I remember our first window unit. It was York that my father bought in 1950. There is little or no difference in that old York then in a unit you would buy today.
Only today, they are a bit smaller and lighter.

11 posted on 05/24/2008 2:09:25 PM PDT by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson