Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swiss
What would the second amendment do against a tank or fighter jet?

Well, let's just lay down and die, then. There's nothing we could possibly do.

16 posted on 05/23/2008 12:28:29 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: IYAS9YAS

My point is this, the legal stuff such as rifles and handguns is pretty useless against tanks and fighter planes. For the Second Amendment to actually work in keeping the people free from dictatorship then such things as antitank missiles or privately own and armed fighter planes should be allowed.

The Second Amendment said the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Arms was not just firearms but cannon and sword and other weapons of war in 1776. Yet we the people have restricted the Second Amendment to only firearms and has taken such weapons as working antitank missiles or armed fighter jets from the public.

As such any rebellion by groups armed only with legal firearms can be crushed easily by the government. Only illegal weapons such as anti aircraft missiles can even give the rebels a chance.


23 posted on 05/23/2008 12:47:32 PM PDT by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson