Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sockdologer; HairOfTheDog

Well it has been a while (over a year) but to go back to the argument, most of Jackson’s changes were part of the necessity to simplify the construction of the story, but some of it was due to his reimagining parts of the characterization, often to simplify. In my mind the worst of this is what he did to Denethor, turning him from a tormented individual damaged by trying to fight Sauron directly, through Palantirs, and defeated as anyone would be in that struggle. He turned him into a demented and gross cowardly fool! Reprehensible!


29 posted on 09/01/2009 2:18:23 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ("men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

True. That was a little worse than Frodo GIVING the ring to the Nazgul. At any rate, simplification is all well and good, but if you provide proper visual imagery, it shouldn’t be necessary. There’s just no excuse for cutting out Tolkien’s beautiful language.


30 posted on 09/01/2009 12:36:04 PM PDT by Sockdologer (Waiting patiently for the Democrats to solve the world's problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson