Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
To the Washington/Madison/Adams Federalists, the "other" faction was the monarchists/nationalists, who didn't want states at all.

Exactly who were these guys?

The closest I'm aware of is Hamilton, who I believe made a single not perhaps serious but indisputably maladroit reference to the need for a monarchy. I believe he was actually referring to the need for a strong single-persopn executive, not for a King.

As far as I know, his suggestion met with universal and immediate rejection.

So who were the monarchists/nationalists?

My understanding of the only two factions were the pro-Constitution Federalists (Hamilton, Washington, Adams) and the anti-Constitution anti-Federalists. The latter wanted greater state power and limited national authority.

31 posted on 05/03/2008 7:13:53 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

Again, check out our chapter in “Patriot’s History.” Mike Allen wrote most of this, and my brief explanation here won’t do it justice. He details precisely how the term “Federalist” was originally the term for separation of powers.


33 posted on 05/04/2008 4:10:18 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson