Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat

You’re getting nowhere, Apache had the same problem when compared to PWS, read the bottom line:

http://www.epibiostat.ucsf.edu/manual/platform/win_service.xml

So in your eyes Apache was as evil as Microsoft for making this available to home users?


111 posted on 05/02/2008 5:17:10 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle
You’re getting nowhere, Apache had the same problem when compared to PWS, read the bottom line:

Thank you very much:

In fact, Windows 95/98 offers no security on the local machine, either. This is the simple reason that the Apache Software Foundation never endorses the use of Windows 95/98 as a public httpd server. These facilities exist only to assist the user in developing web content and learning the Apache server, and perhaps as a intranet server on a secured, private network.
Apache made it available saying never to make it outward-facing, mainly as an internal learning tool. Yet Microsoft shipped PWS with Windows 98, advertising that you can run your own public web server.
112 posted on 05/02/2008 5:25:06 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson