The subject was a curriculum for ID in science classes. Your suggested curriculum, as well as the above post, are laced with religion. You proved my point: ID is religion, not science. The reason there is no ID curriculum is one can't be formulated without exposing ID's religious underpinnings.(Sorry about the spelling error. I don't make very many, but I would prefer to have made none.)
I have very little time to deal with this topic further at present.
In closing for now, I maintain:
Not everything I stated is as laced with religion as you want to believe.
And not everything you advocate is as void of religion as you imply.