OK, a couple more questions: do you agree that micro-evolution happens? If no, why not? If yes, then why not teach evolution at least at that level?
And what scientific rationale leads you to a foundation for ID? Evolutionists can at least point to micro-evolution which most ID supporters concede is factual...
You’re starting too late with your premise.
You’ve got to go back. Way, way back.
Now go back infinitely further.
Where did any of it come from?
The answer to that worldview, that article of faith, will color all further premises.
Atheism is a religion, it’s just anti-God.
Micro-evolution is merely projection of bigger more specious leaps of anti-Creationism. Many critters develop. But a caterpillar doesn’t evolve into a butterfly. Humans develop callouses if they work with their hands a lot. Starfish regenerate organs. Like beget like.
I recall hearing of a case of moth ‘microevolution’ based on fraudulent statistical analysis.
Too many are devout in their efforts to debunk God, even if they use antiscientific dishonesty to plot the points on the curve they like best.
Like beget like.