Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fichori

Scientists force evolution in the lab
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11147751/

Artificial Life Experiments Show How Complex Functions Can Evolve
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/05/030508075843.htm

Evolution in the Laboratory: Up Close and Personal
http://www.science-spirit.org/archive_cm_detail.php?new_id=84

To Test Evolution, Press the ‘Undo’ Button
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0DEFD61731F93BA25750C0A9659C8B63


130 posted on 05/01/2008 12:35:07 PM PDT by Soliton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Soliton; Ethan Clive Osgoode; webstersII
Evolutionary Science is based on Methodological Naturalism.

Methodological Naturalism is based on philosophical assumptions.

It is technically impossible to disprove a philosophical assumption.[1]

Methodological Naturalism can not give a non-naturalistic explanation, even if the evidence clearly indicates a non-naturalistic explanation.[1]

Methodological Naturalism makes the philosophical assumption that all things are naturalistic and all explanations must be naturalistic, regardless of evidence.


It doesn't mater how many links to articles you post, Evolution is still based on philosophical assumptions and that is still not empirical science.


Empirical Science is the best thing that ever happened for the observation of phoneme.

Methodological Naturalism is the worst.


The difference being, the former can validate what is observed, and the later can validate what is not observed.
139 posted on 05/01/2008 1:08:22 PM PDT by Fichori (Truth is non-negotiable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson