Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: llandres

I dont know that Obama is the lesser-known of the two.

I think he is pretty obviously an elitist, out of touch latte liberal, who believes in the beliefs of the ivory tower bunch.

Hillary, because she would do whatever it takes to get or retain power, if far less known. She would take away our liberties in a heartbeat if it was the flavor of the day.
For the very reason that she is considered more centrist, she is likely to flop in any direction if she thinks it would help her personally.

But wait, we should not argue over who is better, we should argue over who is more beatable. Because either one would be a nightmare.


19 posted on 04/22/2008 8:59:59 PM PDT by Andy Koz (It is We The People, not we the sheeple!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Andy Koz

He’s much more than that. He doesn’t hold his own country in high regard. In fact, he picks as his closest confidantes and associates people who actually hate it. That is not the sort of person who should be Commander in Chief. Hillary, at least, views the world as an American, not a racist black suppremacist and/or muslim.


22 posted on 04/22/2008 9:13:57 PM PDT by Nipfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Andy Koz

Thaaaaat’s riiiiiight, my point exactly, your last sentence. The previous statements we could debate, but not that important. I was saying that, by now, we all should know the Clintons well enough that her campaign moments are just variations on a theme. But...regarding BHO - we’re only just beginning to see enough revealed to form healthy fear and loathing (oops, sorry, Hunter S. Thompson). I believe with all my heart that what we’ve seen thus far is only the tip of the iceberg, and I pray that ALL will come out by Nov. (I don’t worry so much about those of us on this board, but about the millions of American voters who don’t know a fraction of the truths that we do, don’t watch FNC, don’t listen to Rush, etc. The millions who aren’t political junkies, passionate researchers, you know? MG, even the morning of the debate last week, G. Stephanopolous, on Hannity’s radio show, truly seemed amazed/fascinated about the Bill Ayers/BHO affiliation once Sean told him, but bless him, at least he took it seriously enough to do further research and then grill BHO at the debate that night. I also talked to many people after that Wed., and was appalled at how many previously had never heard of these troubling issues (in the days since, the polls - and primary tonight - have reflected the impact of those revelations. They need to be repeatedly, consistently exposed). If an “enlightened, insider big-time journalist” such as Stephanopolous didn’t know about these things, what are we to think about the everyday voterS??


27 posted on 04/22/2008 9:47:57 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson