Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congratulations Hillary
opinion | 4-22-2008 | BrianBaldwin

Posted on 04/22/2008 8:17:52 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Brian_Baldwin

Man...heinous post.


21 posted on 04/22/2008 9:01:04 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy Koz

He’s much more than that. He doesn’t hold his own country in high regard. In fact, he picks as his closest confidantes and associates people who actually hate it. That is not the sort of person who should be Commander in Chief. Hillary, at least, views the world as an American, not a racist black suppremacist and/or muslim.


22 posted on 04/22/2008 9:13:57 PM PDT by Nipfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

I literally cringe at the thought of Bill going back to the White House.


23 posted on 04/22/2008 9:30:17 PM PDT by acoulterfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

I would never vote for Hillary but I have to give it to her. She wiped off that smirk off of bambi’s face and gave liberal media the finger. MSM was feeling suicidal these past 3 hours.

The media’s candidate Obama, despite all the scandals could create all kinds of problems for GOP in the general - the constant race card game, the positive press 24/7, etc.

I don’t believe either Hillary or Obama would win the presidency but why take a chance? I’ll take the evil I know over absolute evil who is hellbent on destroying this nation and surrendering to our enemies.

Obama is a dangerous man. He’s a radical Marxist that doesn’t even attempt to hide his beliefs. He loathes our system of government and our western values.

So, uh.. congratulations to Hillary and voters of PA for drawing a line in the sand against Obama - HE SHALL NOT PASS


24 posted on 04/22/2008 9:31:17 PM PDT by Zombie Lincoln (McCain/<conservative_placeholder> '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

me too. never have been able to stomach her, and she is taking women back to the stoneage with her antics.


25 posted on 04/22/2008 9:40:52 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
Actually, I agree with your followers vs. crowd observation.

Because Obama has, his interminable yammering notwithstanding, articulated not a single word of substance.

That his empty noise stirs the rabble into such a foaming frenzy of mindless adulation, can only make one hope that such rabble represents an impotent minority.

26 posted on 04/22/2008 9:43:32 PM PDT by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy Koz

Thaaaaat’s riiiiiight, my point exactly, your last sentence. The previous statements we could debate, but not that important. I was saying that, by now, we all should know the Clintons well enough that her campaign moments are just variations on a theme. But...regarding BHO - we’re only just beginning to see enough revealed to form healthy fear and loathing (oops, sorry, Hunter S. Thompson). I believe with all my heart that what we’ve seen thus far is only the tip of the iceberg, and I pray that ALL will come out by Nov. (I don’t worry so much about those of us on this board, but about the millions of American voters who don’t know a fraction of the truths that we do, don’t watch FNC, don’t listen to Rush, etc. The millions who aren’t political junkies, passionate researchers, you know? MG, even the morning of the debate last week, G. Stephanopolous, on Hannity’s radio show, truly seemed amazed/fascinated about the Bill Ayers/BHO affiliation once Sean told him, but bless him, at least he took it seriously enough to do further research and then grill BHO at the debate that night. I also talked to many people after that Wed., and was appalled at how many previously had never heard of these troubling issues (in the days since, the polls - and primary tonight - have reflected the impact of those revelations. They need to be repeatedly, consistently exposed). If an “enlightened, insider big-time journalist” such as Stephanopolous didn’t know about these things, what are we to think about the everyday voterS??


27 posted on 04/22/2008 9:47:57 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

“What part is the satire?” All of it. “The enemy of my enemy (in this case, BHO) is my friend” - think of it in that vein. Brian B., am I wrong on this? We want our friends here to understand.


28 posted on 04/22/2008 9:51:42 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Andy Koz

“Do we really want our first woman President to be someone who slept her way to the top?”

Hey, we’re not talking about Dr. Laura here!

Does anyone in their right mind really think Bill married Hillary for her talents in bed? Without Hillary, Bill would never have made it to the White House, and then America would have missed out on our most outlandishly entertaining political crime family.


29 posted on 04/22/2008 10:08:15 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: llandres
Yeah, I suppose you think that this also reeks of satire.........

I see a difference between the speech of Hillary and the crowd who supports her, and the speech of Obama and the crowd who supports him. Some describe the difference in terms of tenor of emotion of the Obama crowd, and try to contrast those who support Hillary as if they are less enthusiastic and thus she is lesser than Obama. And yet, that is not what I see, nor is it the truth. The supporters of Hillary, they are not a crowd. They are supporters. And yes, the supporters of Obama, they are a crowd. The difference between supporters and a crowd is, the crowd is mindless. Primitive. The speech of Obama isn’t full of depth. In fact, it is primitive. It is the speech of a cult leader, and the crowd that is before him is very much a cult. That is a difference between Hillary and Obama.

Baldwin nails it here.

I don't think there's anything in the the entire piece that can be characterized as satire.

30 posted on 04/22/2008 10:13:07 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

You are, of course, entitled to your opinion (you’re welcome) and I didn’t listen to Hilldegarde’s speech tonight, as I have an aversion to the sound of her voice, but her win tonight wasn’t near to what she needed in a state she was supposed to win by 20% or more, and the stairs she needs to climb in the other primaries are broken and there are no handrails - she needs amazing victories in all the remaining states, and I doubt she will get them.

If she does, and becomes the nominee, I’ll eat my words, but I’d like mild sauce instead of hot sauce on them - my digestion, you know.


31 posted on 04/22/2008 10:27:56 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (..."I just said some things that werenÂ’t in keeping with what I knew to be the case." - HRC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
And they are primitive

He is John Frum and they are messengers of the the cargo cult.

32 posted on 04/22/2008 10:37:41 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy Koz
Dear Andy,

I was with you until you said Hillary is strong.

Hillary is weak. If my husband did to me what Bill did to her, I would have kicked his butt to the curb. A strong woman can do it on her own; she doesn't take abuse, lies, cheating, etc., from anyone. A strong woman behaves in an honorable fashion, and expects those around her to do so as well.

The fact that she didn't, that she put up with years of flagrant disrespect for her position as WIFE, in one of the most important and defining relationships a person can have, tells me she is WEAK.

33 posted on 04/22/2008 11:07:10 PM PDT by TheWriterTX (Proud Retrosexual Wife of 14 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

I was referring to the tone of his piece congratulating and seeming to support HRC as if he were rooting for her, that’s what I meant. Yes, in the part you just showed, there’s MUCH truth about her supporters vs. BHO’s, in fact, spot-on. When I posted earlier, it was in response to several others who were alarmed/critical that BB was supportive of HRC cheering her on for real (which he wasn’t).


34 posted on 04/23/2008 12:25:20 AM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All
Or that it’s ok for the male husband to literally beat the life out of his wife if she throws a lamp at him.

But the US does allow the reverse, when the husband is on the receiving end of the killing. Look up Mary Winkler.

35 posted on 04/23/2008 7:47:59 AM PDT by Shigarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson