No honest review would equate ID and Creationism.
Why not?
The Discovery Institute's Wedge Strategy lays out the plan whereby they will push religion in the guise of science.
The phrase “cdesign proponentsists” in a draft of the Pandas book shows that the term “design proponents” almost completely replaced “creationists” in 1987, following the U.S. Supreme Court's Edwards decision. None of the definitions or text changed -- just "creationists" being replaced by "design proponents."
And finally a Federal District Court has weighed the evidence and determined that ID is creationism (Dover).
So why is it that a review would not note this obvious connection between ID and creationism.