[Coyoteman]

The editor in chief is a rabbit homosexual. Scientific American is no longer a “science” magazine. It is liberal propaganda. As a liberal, I don't expect you to see that. You can not get more biased on evolution that Scientific American. Enjoy the godless world and magic black box of fellow atheist. Now don't get upset. I don't mind if your religion is evolution.

Can I take it then that you didn't like the review I posted? Or did you even read it before going off on an entirely unrelated rant about the presumed sexual orientation of the editor of the magazine? Is that what passes for research among creationists, or is it just you?

Whatever. Here's another review for you to ignore. And don't bother to enlighten me on the sexual orientation of the editor or author. It doesn't matter as much to me as it obviously does to you.

Science Sunday: Intelligent Design Goes to the Movies

[celmak]

"...rant about the presumed sexual orientation of the editor of the magazine?"

And,

" It doesn't matter as much to me as it obviously does to you."

Well Coyoteman I believe your showing your true colors (rainbow)!