Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
No, they're bad because even after a few versions after the standard they still don't completely support it.

It's not their fault whoever developed the standard decided to make it incompatible with existing software. You seem determined that Microsoft has some obligation to make it easy for everone else, but nobody owes them crap.

262 posted on 04/15/2008 12:11:30 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
It's not their fault whoever developed the standard decided to make it incompatible with existing software

Why didn't Microsoft make Exchange compatible with the earlier WordPerfect Office? Because they're all proprietary, practically designed for lock-in. Standards are supposed to allow everyone to use them. Microsoft has a long-standing problem with that concept.

You seem determined that Microsoft has some obligation to make it easy for everone else

No, Microsoft has no such obligation except for certain aspects of its criminal monopoly conviction. Of course, nobody has an obligation to buy Microsoft's products (I hope).

265 posted on 04/15/2008 12:25:37 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson