Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Condor 63

I’m sure being an Englishman he is to the left of most in America. The outstanding job he did in Casino Royale proves what a good actor he is. I have liked him in everything I have seen him in. And he hasn’t been too out there with his politics the best I can tell. He has been asked questions and answered honestly, which I can’t fault him for.

I do think “Quantum of Solace” is an awful title though.


5 posted on 04/05/2008 5:38:13 PM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Blonde

His discussion of playing the Lucifer character in the Golden Compass put a chill down my spine. He enthused at length about his complete agreement with Pullman’s worldview and philosophy.

Still, a soulless actor playing Bond is not necessarily a bad thing. Bond, as Fleming wrote him, was a borderline sociopath unfit for normal society and relationships, but redeemed by his usefulness in the extraordinary circumstances into which the novels thrust him.

Bond only kills targets of British intelligence; Craig wants to kill God. With typecasting like that, how wrong can the film go?


8 posted on 04/05/2008 8:06:43 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Blonde

“Quantum of Solace” is the title of one of Fleming’s early short stories. In the new film, “Quantum” apparently is the name of the Spectre/SMERSH-like organization that Bond takes on.


10 posted on 04/06/2008 2:05:49 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson