I’ve never ever ever met someone who got a lower back tattoo that even thought of it as a sexual thing.
However, like some sleezy geezers I knew who thought girls wearing pants were doing it show off their “hoo hoo”s (this was in the 70’s when pants were first allowed in schools).... I see the same mentality behind those who see every lower back tat as “she’s goin’ for sex” when really, she was going for pretty.
The issue is how and when and why it’s displayed.
I have seen that 98% of all strippers seem to have them.
I mean, I HEARD that about the strippers.
Yes, but do you see where your logic falters? First, earlier in the thread you were describing the people you know with tattoos and telling us how well educated they are and what good character they have. You're not talking to the kind of woman who would get a tat in that spot so some guy can take it as an invite. It's like me saying "I just came back from the Marine Corps base and all those guys have tattoos, so no one with a tat is unpatriotic."
Second, what woman would tell anyone she got a lower back tattoo so it would be used as "approach lights?"
I know you've seen what people do to children when they have a totally broken moral compass. Well, imagine a person with a compass just as broken, but their deal is sex and self-destruction instead of destroying someone else. There's really very little that person wouldn't do to themselves and then try to justify it with some noble-sounding excuse. We humans have a vast ability for self delusion. (Of course, I'm probably deluding myself by thinking I'm telling you anything new here. ;-] )
The good news is, Christ stands ready to help them all.