It doesn't. There's a search engine in that archive. There are links to supplemental materials in that archive. There's your library, other electronic archives, numerous other links and electronically available publications, books and texts at your local bookstore, books and texts available through Amazon and other web-based booksellers, and subscription and non-subscription periodicals. Exercise your research skills, which appear to have atrophied. Go forth. Learn. And stop whining.
How come it has to be 93,000 or nothing?
It doesn't. There's a search engine in that archive. There are links to supplemental materials in that archive. There's your library, other electronic archives, numerous other links and electronically available publications, books and texts at your local bookstore, books and texts available through Amazon and other web-based booksellers, and subscription and non-subscription periodicals. Exercise your research skills, which appear to have atrophied. Go forth. Learn. And stop whining.
Ahh, just as I thought. There's mountains of solid evidence, and yet no-one can give me one good evidence.
But I do see one evidence -- when the inquirer finds himself the recipient of ad hominem arguments he has a reasonable chance of being correct in his argument!
About the only time I see sober grown men insulting eachother is when the instultee's argument is correct so the only thing then left to attack is the messenger.
After long enough of a person hearing "There's mountains of solid evidence" and after long enough of being insulted for asking "what is the best evidence," a thinking person is quite reasonable to come to the conclusion that there isn't mountains of solid evidence.
-Jesse