[Creationist]

Sorry you are so blinded by your religious belief in evolution that you discount the fact that evolution does not play any part of geology, physics cosmology astronomy and biology.

That is unless you are claiming that there are 6 definitions of evolution. To which only the last one is observable and is used by evolutionary discussions as proof that the rest are true.

1: Cosmic evolution = big bang, origins
This one is claimed by every evolutionary debate as not part of evolution there for it does not require faith to believe something that no one seen as to have happened as stated by scientist (prophets)

2: chemical evolution + chemicals evolving to higher chemicals, that is all the atoms of the universe were once hydrogen, another faith based process as no one can reproduce this, that is hydrogen will not turn into uranium.

3: Planetary and stellar evolution = origin of stars and planets, here is a cool one no one has ever recorded a new star forming only exploding.

4: Organic evolution = origin of life, here is a real faith based belief upon the heart of the naturalist, rain fell upon the rocks (in a oxygen less environment) washing the minerals into a sea (of mass action) where lighting struck the volcanic warmed puddle and wallah you have life. Now maybe in secular chemistry they teach you something different but rain is made up of OXYGEN, and lightening makes OZONE.

5: Macro evolution = squiggly thing turns into swimming thing which turns into crawly thing which turns into flying thing and eventually man, now mind you this process has never been seen to take place yet mindless people believe that when a educated person puts fossils in a particular order he has proved evolution.

Micro evolution = adaptation and variation, this one has been observed can be tested and is true. This does not give evidence to the others in any way.

It is interesting that you bring up physics as the theory of evolution and the first five definitions of evolution described above break the laws in many areas.
Since evolution does not deal with origins as I have often been corrected upon cosmology is not threatened by creation as a possibility. Same with astronomy.

As for biology there is not one area of biology that requires any form of the 1 st five definitions to teach or learn it properly.

[From many - one.]

Here’s what I said:
“What science is ok with Huckabee?

Best I can tell, he rules out much of geology, physics, cosmology, astronomy and most of biology.”

Note that I was asking a question, and was not referring to evolution playing a part in the other sciences.