you are arguing with someone (coyote) who apparently is completely ignorant of what ID science is and is not- Coyote is only inteerested in making false claims about ID and voicing his disdain using accusatiosn that are not only false, but entirely irrelevent to any intellectually honest conversation about science. Any conversation with him can only result in a futile excersize in redundancy and willful ignorance on his part- When showed tiem and time again that ID studies biological sciences, he simply ignores those FACTS and keeps repeatign the same lame tired out mantra of his over and over again. I’ve been on FR for several years now, and his message has not changed one iota in all those years despite ample evidneces to refute his rediculous accusations.
[[I do not wish to debate Evolution with someone who makes up their own rules and definitions as they go along, so as to handicap their opponent.]
I’m afraid you’ll have to if you wish to debate him. You see- believing in a bioligcally impossible hypothesis to him is pure sicnece while the study of IC/ID- a study that investigates actual empiracle evidences that can be tested and produced and shown is a ‘religion’- nothign but pure religion- nothign but an attempt to ‘sneak religion into classrooms’ you see. An evil plot to present biological FACTS- whoops- I mean ‘religious beliefs’ into classrooms. (Coyote is apparently unaware of the true definition of ID)
Good luck debating him.