Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical; CottShop
Where are those two images from, and who said they were supposed to contain the same pieces?

You don't read the links you defend?

This doesn't look familiar?

AiG lies about Ambulocetus pelvis

547 posted on 04/04/2008 12:16:44 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
You don't read the links you defend?

No need to be a jerk. I agree that those photos do not contain the identical pieces. It looks to me like the color one has a handful more pieces than the black and white one, which from the way it's described ("there is a black and white image of the same skeleton on Dr. Thewissen’s web site that was once used instead of the above color image") is probably an earlier photo. It makes sense that the later photo would have more pieces. Also, the b&w photo seems to be an attempt to put the skeleton together as it would be in the animal, while the color photo spreads the bones out for easier inspection. And the rib bones are arranged in different orders, but they mostly seem to be the same bones. But other than those things, the only real anomaly I see is the right hip in the b&w one, which seems more complete than the color version. I don't know why that is, but it's a pretty trivial issue.

551 posted on 04/04/2008 12:52:03 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson