Yet their lie still remains.
From your second link Serfati states “For example, since the pelvic girdle is not preserved, there is no direct evidence in Ambulocetus for a connection between the hind limbs and the axial skeleton. This hinders interpretations of locomotion in this animal, since many of the muscles that support and move the hindlimb originate on the pelvis”
And Jonathan Sarfati's lie is still there.
One would think that 10 years is more than enough time to correct a honest mistake! Unless of course, one had no intention of being honest ...
[[One would think that 10 years is more than enough time to correct a honest mistake! Unless of course, one had no intention of being honest ...]]
Yes Yes, ‘no intention’ of clearing it up- The post script cleared it up, but to you, it’s not cleared up- whatever-
[[Yet their lie still remains]]
And just for hte record- a mistake isn’t a lie
A mistake isn’t a lie- and a correction postscript- hwether doen by himself, or in regards to his article is a corection unlike the site I spoke of earlier
[[One would think that 10 years is more than enough time to correct a honest mistake! Unless of course, one had no intention of being honest ..]]
I explained why articles aren’t manipluated after the fact- accept it or don’tr- I don’t really care- but a mistake does NOT render a whole site invalid contrary to your accusation