Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
But those who are criticizing science for poor performance in those areas often choose themselves to define TRVTH on the basis of divine revelation and scripture for which there is absolutely no concrete evidence provided.

So then what is the standard to be used to determine these things? Something men made up? How is that different than divine revelation that you sneer at? Is consensus really the way to determine truth?

364 posted on 04/01/2008 7:30:34 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
So then what is the standard to be used to determine these things? Something men made up? How is that different than divine revelation that you sneer at?

It can be observed and measured. Divine revelation can't. Otherwise there would not be some 4,300 world religions, most of which believe they, and only they, have the real TRVTH.

ps. What happened to cause you to hate science so much? There is hardly a science thread on this site where you don't show up and denigrate whatever is being discussed.

368 posted on 04/01/2008 7:52:04 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson