Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dan1123
Defining science as naturalism doesn't do away with the philosophical assumptions of science. How do you know naturalism is true? Is naturalism falsifiable?

I tend to avoid philosophers and their output. They have been arguing about things for several millennia and have come up with little to show for it.

I particularly ignore their comments on science. Usually they amount to nothing more than, "But we were here first! Please pay some attention to us... Oh, please!"

While philosophers are babbling on, scientists are out there doing useful things.

(Oh, and don't bother to tell me that Ph.D. stands for Doctor of Philosophy. I got a Ph.D. without ever having to take a philosophy course -- I avoided sociology and economics as well, and haven't missed any of them.)

296 posted on 03/31/2008 4:17:05 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
I tend to avoid philosophers and their output.

Well, until you begin to understand philosophy, your posts will continue to be stunted on crevo threads.

297 posted on 03/31/2008 4:56:24 PM PDT by dan1123 (If you want to find a person's true religion, ask them what makes them a "good person".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson