Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RussP

I do not think the majority of modern physicists believe in ID because the majority of modern physicists are not Biblical literalists.

Are you defining ID or Design as the equivalent of Biblical Creation?

Since I have no problem letting physicists do physics, I have no need to read your selection of books. It is you that is challenging the fundamental concepts of biology without understanding them.


106 posted on 03/30/2008 7:13:49 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: From many - one.

“Are you defining ID or Design as the equivalent of Biblical Creation?”

No, of course not. That definition is a typical straw man used by evolutionists who are incapable of dealing directly with ID.

Biblical Creationism itself is actually perfectly consistent with what we know about the universe and its origin. The problem is that so-called “young earth creationists” have latched onto a mistranslation of the original Hebrew text. The “days” of creation are not literal 24-hour days, but rather epochs or eons.


141 posted on 03/30/2008 11:50:56 AM PDT by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson