[Non-Sequitur]

in other words, you don't have THE GUTS to defend/condemn Dredd Scott, Roe v. Wade and/or Plessy v. Ferguson & you HOPE that nobody notices that FACT.

Why would I want to defend them?

[stand watie]

"Why would i want to defend them?" ===> you're NOT that DUMB.

you must as "a WORSHIPER of the federal courts" either believe that the USSC is INFALLIBLE or HIGHLY fallible on a host of issues. "court worshipers" don't get to pick & choose the decisions that they LIKE & fail to support those that they DON'T like, unless that they/you don't mind LOOKING silly.

thus either must you SUPPORT or CONDEMN the UN-popular decisions to be morally/intellectually/philosophically consistent.

free dixie,sw

[stand watie]

"Why would i want to defend them?" ===> you're NOT that DUMB.

you must, as "a WORSHIPER of the federal courts", either believe that the USSC is INFALLIBLE or HIGHLY fallible on a host of issues. ("court worshipers" don't get to pick & choose the decisions that they LIKE & fail to support those that they DON'T like, unless that they/you don't mind LOOKING silly.)

thus either must you SUPPORT or CONDEMN the UN-popular decisions to be morally/intellectually/philosophically consistent. if Roe v. Wade/Plessy v. Ferguson/Dredd Scott is FOOLISH, WRONGLY decided & UNCONSTITUTIONAL, then ALL other decisions MAY be equally WRONG & FOOLISH as well.

free dixie,sw

[stand watie]

fwiw, your "filthy-talking LOUT" (& member in good-standing of "the DY coven") is posting to me again, despite the FACT that he knows i neither read nor respond to his NONSENSE, ignorance, bigotry & VULGARITY. ===> that gives new meaning to clue-LESS & STUPID. (N-S, you must be VERY proud to have such a "stellar creature" on "your team".)

laughing AT the DUMB-bunnies, bigots & FOOLS of "the DY coven".

to ALL: the more i learn about vulgar/sanctimonious/SELF-important DAMNyankee IDIOTS, the better i like poisonous snakes,rats, slugs & spiders.

free dixie,sw